December 20th 2009
To read Proffers and Reno's Notes:
Proffers for Riley and Wolffe


December 10th 2009


Regarding the news update on Brown supporters at the end of the story, here's this from Reno Gonzalez's lawyer
http://www.appealslawyer.net/briefs/Gonzalez_Cirino_BriefAsFiled.pdf


December 5th 2009

Cirino was handed a response from Administrators noticing him that he had 20 days to reply.
But the response was held for TEN days before given to Cirino.
(Cirino got the C/O "Scheurer" to sign the response when delivered)
The case number is 565879-F1
We need to complain about the administration'..s foot-dragging.

[SAMPLE: "I want to lodge a formal complaint regarding the foot-dragging of BOP officials in Administrative Remedy Case# 565879-F1 on time sensitive documents and the BOP's policies circumventing DUE PROCESS, as per the 5th & 14th Amendments of the United States Constitution"]

Direct your calls to:
214-224-3389 and 202-307-3198

and/or correspondence to:

Gerardo Maldonado, Jr.
Regional Director, South Central Regional Office
Federal Bureau of Prisons
4211 Cedar Springs Rd
Dallas, TX 75219
Phone: 214-224-3389
E-mail: E-mail: SCRO/EXECASSISTANT@BOP.GOV*

Harley G. Lappin
Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
320 First St., NW,
Washington, DC 20534
For general information, call 202-307-3198


If you are better at articulating you can also complain that BOP placement policy violate requirements of Due Process




November 27th 2009

Dear Brain Trust,

Enclosed is a 3 page packet

tracking my “Paper trail of Injustice.”

1 of 3 is most recent “Cop Out” I had
submitted to correct my security
level. Mr Haines, J. decided to
use a delay structured response
instead of acting honorably in
his position. He never held a meeting
with me. I do not even know
what he looks like. (Case Manager)
2 of 3 is “BP-8” filed & answered by Mr
Hamlin, (Unit Counselor of “A” Unit). Sadly
he too decided to lie to me instead
of acting honorably in his position.
Now where is the words “close
supervision” written in Mr Haines, J.
reply (1 of 3) to my “Cop Out.” Therefore it is
not “clearly stated” as Mr Hamlin’s reply
implies. In my book, that’s a lie, which
I had just complained about on the
same “BP-8” form!

Plus! Minimum (Comp)/Low/Medium/
High are the order of security levels
for prison systems from least to the
greatest. Remember this order …



2 of 2

Even if this current situation of
my security level were current as in
having 8 points which is “Camp points”/

Minimum prison – A “Management
Variable” only allow an increase
or decrease by ONE security level.

Consequently : ONE level up from my
minimum security score (at present) of
8 points places my status then still
in a low! “ El Reno ” is not a low;
it is a medium, “F.C.I.” Hence, I am
not appropriately housed at F.C.I El Reno
, as determined by the BOP.

So lets recap: Mr Hamlin is a liar.

(Which is sad because I did trust him
to do right).

3 of 3 is currently the next step, “BP-09”

As you can read, it states my issues of
my current situation. It was submitted
today 11/19/09.

I will continue to keep you advised.



Signed
Cirino Gonzalez
AKA Reno

1/3



2/3



3/3






November 25th 2009
Appeals Denied for Returned Firearms














Novemeber 1st 2009

October 20th, 2009

B. Obama advised of Cirino Gonzalez, Elaine & Ed Brown

From: Jose M.

“He that violates his oath profanes the divinity of faith itself.” … Cicero

Sent by United States Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECIEPT
To:

U.S. President Barack Obama 7008 1300 0001 9865 6511
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

U.S. Congress member
Kay Bailey Hutchinson 7008 1300 0001 9765 6504
284 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

U.S. Congress member John Cornyn 7008 1300 0001 9765 6498
517 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

U.S. Representative Ruben Hinojosa 7008 1300 0001 9765 6481
2463 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

Please, see the attached NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND CRIMINAL INTENT, the delivery information thereof, and reply by mail within TEN business days of receiving this letter as verified by United States Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECIEPT (numbers as listed above per each recipient’s name) and include the tax identification number of your office, the name and account number of your bond (insurance) company, as well as your personal tax identification and/or social security number.

In accordance to the established checks and balances expected/..DEMANDED of your position I, Jose Manuel Gonzalez©, and on behalf of victims Cirino Gonzalez, Romeo Lee Gonzalez, Donna Mae VanMeter, Jason Gerhart, Daniel Riley, Robert Wolffe, Edward Brown, Elaine Brown, and countless freedom-loving inhabitants of various States of the United States of America, do hereby notify you of my/our CLAIM against your duty to over-see, stop an injustice, and correct an ongoing act of lawlessness on the part of the Judicial branch of the United States of America.
My DEMAND and CLAIM is made as acceptance of your OATH OF OFFICE, by which you swore to uphold THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA as a condition of the elected position held by you.

1. Inaction on your part to immediately correct this most egregious violation against the principles of freedom established by the founding fathers of these united States is evidence of your incompetence, complacency, or willingness to be a conspirator in the violation of Rights and acts of treason against the people of sovereign States of the United States of America …
2. making YOU personally liable for legal and civil actions as retribution for the violations of rights of the above listed victims …
3. and making your OFFICE liable for civil/..financial retribution for the violations of rights of the above listed victims …
4. and making your staff members liable for legal, civil, and financial retribution for the violations of rights of the above listed victims …
5. in accordance to the U.S. Criminal code, The Uniform Commercial Code, and Civil code, as well as the United States Constitution.
6. My repeated attempts to contact you, your office, or staff have met with a lack of response.
7. NOTICE to agent is considered notice to principle; notice to principle is considered notice to agent.
8. Reply within ten business day of receipt of this AFFIDAVIT, as verified by
United States Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECIEPTs:
7008 1300 0001 9865 6511
7008 1300 0001 9765 6504
7008 1300 0001 9765 6498
7008 1300 0001 9765 6481

Copy: Alice Echo-News Journal
Corpus Christi Caller-Times

_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..______________ _________
Jose M. Gonzalez© Date

This document was acknowledged before me on _____________ (date)

_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._______________
(signature of notarial officer) Seal/Stamp:

_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._______________
(print name notarial officer) My commission expires:.._.._______________

...
The "attached NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND CRIMINAL INTENT" is as follows:

Sent by certified mail, return receipt requested
7008 2810 0001 0429 6204
District of New Hampshire
53 Pleasant Street
Concord, New Hampshire 03301

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NOTICE OF
VIOLATION
AND CRIMINAL INTENT
Vs.
? FILE ON DEMAND ?
CIRINO GONZALEZ POST ON
BULLETIN
Cr. No. 07-189-01-GZS


NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND CRIMINAL INTENT

In as much as UNITED STATES officials are protected, by law, from personal liability only within the performance of their OFFICIAL duties, The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, and ALL of its officers, employees, and agents IS/ARE Hereby NOTIFIED of their violation of:

A. Article 1 section 8 clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution:
…to exercise exclusive Legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, magazines, Arsenals, dock Yards, and other needful Buildings;…”

B. New Hampshire revised statutes and specifically RSA 123:1:
TITLE IX ACQUISITION OF LANDS BY UNITED STATES; FEDERAL AID CHAPTER 123 JURISDICTION OVER LANDS ACQUIRED; TAX EXEMPTION Section 123:1, 123:1 Ceded to United States. – Jurisdiction is ceded to the United States of America over all lands within this state now or hereafter exclusively owned by the United States, and used as sites for post offices, custom-houses, military air bases, military installations or other public buildings: provided, that an accurate description and plan of the lands so owned and occupied, verified by the oath of some officer of the United States having knowledge of the facts, shall be filed with the secretary of this state; and, provided, further, that this cession is upon the express condition that the state of New Hampshire shall retain concurrent jurisdiction with the United States in and over all such lands, so far that all civil and criminal process issuing under the authority of this state may be executed on the said lands and in any building now or hereafter erected thereon, in the same way and with the same effect as if this statute had not been enacted; and that exclusive jurisdiction shall revert to and revest in this state whenever the lands shall cease to be the property of the United States

C. 40 U.S.C. § 255. This statute requires the head or authorized officer of the agency acquiring or holding property to file with the state a formal acceptance of such "jurisdiction, exclusive or partial as he may deem desirable," and further provides that in the absence of such filing "it shall be conclusively presumed that no such jurisdiction has been acquired." See Adams v. United States, 319 U.S. 312 (district court is without jurisdiction to prosecute soldiers for rape committed on an army base prior to filing of acceptance prescribed by statute). The requirement of 40 U.S.C. § 255 can also be fulfilled by any filing satisfying state law…

Further action on the part of officers, employees, and agents pertaining or related to Cr. No. 07-189-01-GZS will be deemed as a WILLFUL AND INTENTIAL VIOLATION on the part of ALL officers, employees, and agents NOTIFIED herein; making any/ALL officers, employees, and agents personally LIABLE and subject to civil/criminal litigation. Other cases, previous, current, pending, or future, are also affected.

Denials, by Officers of the Court, of MOTIONs questioning JURISDICTION and refusal to demand, of the U.S Attorney, a demonstration/..REVELATION OF JURISDICTION, regarding A, B, and C above, is deemed as conspiratorial and a violation of OTHER acts, codes, rules, and statutes to be considered upon further investigation by COMPLIANT States authorities with proper jurisdiction.

Officials, employees, and agents of/within the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, may also be in violation of other New Hampshire and United States Statutes, Acts, Codes, and Rules requiring the prevention of, and acting upon, criminal activity known to them and may apply retroactive as per investigation.

As a concerned third-party, this NOTICE is hereby served as a demand of release of Cirino Gonzalez as the ONLY option available to the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE within its STATUS of NONCOMPLIANCE of A, B, and C above.



_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..______________ _________
Jose M. Gonzalez Date

This document was acknowledged before me on _____________ (date)

_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._______________
(signature of notarial officer) Seal/Stamp:

_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._______________
(print name notarial officer) My commission expires:.._.._______________


...also included was a January 11, 2007 copy of a gold-sealed letter to Joe Hass form the New Hampshire Dapartment of State stating "This is to certify that we have checked our recordes and do not find a copy of the filing by RSA 123:1"
Signed by David M Scanlan
Deputy Secretary of State


October 16th 2009
Appeals Brief for Cirino Gonzalez

Cirinos Appeals Brief

September 7th 2009

UPDATE: Cirino's Attorney Visit
(video by Jose Gonzalez)


August 9th 2009 Letter from Appeals Attorney